Back to Search Start Over

[Prognostic value of functional assessment at admission in an emergency short-stay unit].

Authors :
Fernández Alonso C
Martín Sánchez FJ
Fuentes Ferrer M
González Del Castillo J
Verdejo Bravo C
Gil Gregorio P
Ribera Casado JM
Villarroel Elipe P
González Armengol JJ
Source :
Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia [Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol] 2010 Mar-Apr; Vol. 45 (2), pp. 63-6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Feb 23.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Introduction: To determine the prognostic value of functional impairment on the final destination of elders admitted for acute medical illness to an emergency short-stay unit (ESSU).<br />Material and Methods: We performed a prospective analysis of patients aged more than 65 years old admitted to the ESSU of Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Madrid in April 2008. A protocol was designed that included epidemiologic variables (age and gender), clinical variables (reason for admission, comorbidity measured by the Charlson Index [CI]) and functional variables (previous, admission and functional decline [FD] measured with the Barthel [BI] and Lawton Indexes [LI]). The prognostic value of FD on the decision to admit patients was analyzed through ROC curves and the cut points that maximized sensitivity and specificity were determined.<br />Results: Sixty patients were included with a mean age of 80.7 (SD 8.2) years and 71.7% were women. The reasons for admission were acute infections in 31.7%, heart failure in 23.3%, syncope in 15.0%, intestinal obstruction in 11.7%, gastrointestinal bleeding in 10.0%, and arrhythmias in 8.3%. The mean CI was 2.27 (1.45). Functional assessment was as follows: mean previous BI score: 79.25 (SD 25) and at admission: 62.92 (SD 28.19). Mean previous LI score: 4.85 (SD 2.45) and at admission: 2.98 (SD 2.42).): BI-FD: 20% (1.25-38.23), LI-FD 37.5% (16.7-70.2%). FD was found in 100% of the patients. The mean length of stay was 1.70 (SD 0.62) days. Discharge destination was home discharge in 46.7% and hospitalization unit in 53.3%. Multivariate analysis according to discharge destination (home vs hospitalization) provided the following results : BI-FI > or = 16% (OR=7.99 [1.1-60.5], p=0.037), LI-FI > or =35% (OR=19.6 [0.04-0.52], p <0.0001).<br />Conclusions: Patients with significant FD in the emergency room should not be admitted to an ESSU since significant FD is a prognostic factor for transfer to a conventional ward.<br /> (Copyright 2009 SEGG. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
Spanish; Castilian
ISSN :
0211-139X
Volume :
45
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20181412
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2009.09.006