Back to Search Start Over

Quantitative and statistical analysis of differences in sensitivity between Long-Evans and Han/Wistar rats following long-term exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors :
Sand S
Fletcher N
von Rosen D
Kalantari F
Viluksela M
Tuomisto JT
Tuomisto J
Falk-Filipsson A
HÃ¥kansson H
Source :
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP [Regul Toxicol Pharmacol] 2010 Jul-Aug; Vol. 57 (2-3), pp. 136-45. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Feb 04.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

In this study, differences in sensitivity between Long-Evans (L-E; dioxin sensitive) and Han/Wistar (H/W; dioxin resistant) rats following long-term exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) were statistically and quantitatively investigated. Sensitivity differences were analyzed by comparing benchmark doses (BMDs) for the two strains considering a number of toxicological endpoints including data on body and organ weights, hepatic foci, hepatic CYP1A1 induction, as well as tissue retinoid levels. Dose-response relationships for L-E and H/W rats, described by the Hill function, were assumed to be parallel, which was supported according to statistical analysis. It was concluded that L-E and H/W rats differed statistically in their response to TCDD treatment for most of the parameters investigated. Differences between the strains were most pronounced for hepatic foci; L-E rats were approximately 20-40 times more sensitive than H/W rats. For body and organ weight parameters, L-E rats were approximately 10-20 times more sensitive than H/W rats. For retinoid parameters and hepatic CYP1A1 induction, estimated differences between the strains were generally about 5-fold, and associated with a low uncertainty. In conclusion, the present study employs a dose-response modeling approach suitable for statistical evaluation of strain and species differences in sensitivity to chemical exposure. The study demonstrates quantitatively the differences in sensitivity between the L-E and H/W rat strains following long-term TCDD exposure.<br /> (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1096-0295
Volume :
57
Issue :
2-3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20138101
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.01.006