Back to Search Start Over

A simple score to predict the outcome of severe malaria in adults.

Authors :
Hanson J
Lee SJ
Mohanty S
Faiz MA
Anstey NM
Charunwatthana P
Yunus EB
Mishra SK
Tjitra E
Price RN
Rahman R
Nosten F
Htut Y
Hoque G
Hong Chau TT
Hoan Phu N
Hien TT
White NJ
Day NP
Dondorp AM
Source :
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Clin Infect Dis] 2010 Mar 01; Vol. 50 (5), pp. 679-85.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Background: World Health Organization treatment guidelines recommend that adults with severe malaria be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). However, ICU facilities are limited in the resource-poor settings where most malaria occurs. Identification of patients at greater risk of complications may facilitate their triage and resource allocation.<br />Methods: With use of data from a trial conducted in Southeast Asia (n=868), a logistic regression model was built to identify independent predictors of mortality among adults with severe malaria. A scoring system based on this model was tested in the original dataset and then validated in 2 series from Bangladesh (n=188) and Vietnam (n=292).<br />Results: Acidosis (base deficit) and cerebral malaria (measured as Glasgow Coma Score) were the main independent predictors of outcome. The 5-point Coma Acidosis Malaria (CAM) score was simply derived from these 2 variables. Mortality increased steadily with increasing score. A CAM score <2 predicted survival with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93%- 97.7%). Of the 14 of 331 patients who died with a CAM score <2, 11 (79%) had renal failure and death occurred late after hospital admission (median, 108 h; range, 40-360 h). Substitution of plasma bicarbonate as the measure of acidosis only slightly reduced the prognostic value of the model. Use of respiratory rate was inferior, but a score <2 still predicted survival with a PPV of 92.2% (95% CI, 89.1%-94.7%).<br />Conclusions: Patients with a CAM score <2 at hospital admission may be safely treated in a general ward, provided that renal function can be monitored.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-6591
Volume :
50
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20105074
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1086/649928