Back to Search Start Over

High-resolution diffusion tensor MR imaging for evaluating myocardial anisotropy and fiber tracking at 3T: the effect of the number of diffusion-sensitizing gradient directions.

Authors :
Choi SI
Kang JW
Chun EJ
Choi SH
Lim TH
Source :
Korean journal of radiology [Korean J Radiol] 2010 Jan-Feb; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 54-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Dec 28.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Objective: We wanted to evaluate the effect of the number of diffusion-sensitizing gradient directions on the image quality for evaluating myocardial anisotropy and fiber tracking by using in vitro diffusion tensor MR imaging (DT-MRI).<br />Materials and Methods: The DT-MR images, using a SENSE-based echoplanar imaging technique, were acquired from ten excised porcine hearts by using a 3T MR scanner. With a b-value of 800 s/mm(2), the diffusion tensor images were obtained for 6, 15 and 32 diffusion-sensitizing gradient directions at the midventricular level. The number of tracked fibers, the fractional anisotropy (FA), and the length of the tracked fibers were measured for the quantitative analysis. Two radiologists assessed the image quality of the fiber tractography for the qualitative analysis.<br />Results: By increasing the number of diffusion-sensitizing gradient directions from 6 to 15, and then to 32, the FA and standard deviation were significantly reduced (p < 0.01), and the number of tracked fibers and the length of the tracked fibers were significantly increased (p < 0.01). The image quality of the fiber tractography was significantly increased with the increased number of diffusion-sensitizing gradient directions (p < 0.01).<br />Conclusion: The image quality of in vitro DT-MRI is significantly improved as the number of diffusion-sensitizing gradient directions is increased.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2005-8330
Volume :
11
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Korean journal of radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20046495
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.54