Back to Search Start Over

Intracellular H+ buffering power and its dependency on intracellular pH.

Authors :
Saleh AM
Rombola G
Batlle DC
Source :
Kidney international [Kidney Int] 1991 Feb; Vol. 39 (2), pp. 282-8.
Publication Year :
1991

Abstract

Intracellular hydrogen ion (H+) buffering power, conventionally defined as the amount of acid or base that would have to be introduced into the cell cytosol to decrease or increase ipH by one pH unit, is generally said to increase as intracellular pH (ipH) decreases. This implies that the cell has a lesser capability to resist acute acid or base perturbations at its steady state ipH than at any lower ipH. We re-examined this notion, reasoning that the logarithmic nature of the pH unit could limit the validity of the conventional expression of buffering power in imparting physiologic insight into the mechanisms of cellular H+ homeostasis. The mathematical derivation of the formula, delta i[NH4+]/delta ipH, conventionally used to estimate buffering power using the NH4Cl technique, revealed that this parameter is, by design, inversely proportional to the exponential of ipH. This a priori dependence on pH dictates an increase in buffering power with decreasing ipH, and thereby interferes with the assessment of the physiologic capability of the intracellular milieu to buffer protons at different ipH levels. To circumvent this problem, buffering power was defined as the amount of hydrogen ions that would have to be added to or removed from the cell to effect a change in the concentration of H+ in the cell cytosol of 1 mM (a term heretofore referred to as the cell H+ buffering coefficient). The mathematical derivation of the formula used to calculate the cell H+ buffering coefficient, delta i[NH4+]/delta[H+]i, does not suffer from an a priori dependence on ipH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0085-2538
Volume :
39
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Kidney international
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
2002641
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1991.34