Back to Search Start Over

Potential enzyme cost reduction with the addition of surfactant during the hydrolysis of pretreated softwood.

Authors :
Tu M
Saddler JN
Source :
Applied biochemistry and biotechnology [Appl Biochem Biotechnol] 2010 May; Vol. 161 (1-8), pp. 274-87. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Nov 28.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

The potential economic benefits of surfactants addition on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded lodgepole pine (SELP) and ethanol-pretreated lodgepole pine (EPLP) were investigated in this study. Free cellulase readsorption on fresh substrate was used to recover and recycle cellulase enzymes during the hydrolysis of SELP and EPLP substrate. Supplementing Tween 80 during the hydrolysis could facilitate enzyme recycling for EPLP substrate. A logarithmic correlation was established between surfactant concentration and free cellulase content after lignocellulosic hydrolysis, which was used to compute enzyme cost savings over various Tween 80 concentrations. A simple economic analysis of enzyme cost savings versus the cost of surfactant was undertaken. The results indicated that the addition of Tween 80 (priced at US $0.25/kg) during the hydrolysis of the EPLP substrate could save 60% of the total enzyme cost at concentrations in the 0.025% to 0.2% range. The addition of Tween for the hydrolysis of the SELP substrate significantly reduced the material cost by 24% per 1 gal of ethanol produced, and the ethanol production cost could be reduced by 8.6% with the addition of Tween and enzymes recycle for the hydrolysis of SELP substrate. A schematic concept of recycling enzyme and surfactant was also presented with a recirculation of process streams during hydrolysis. Further analysis indicated a 66% reduction in total enzyme cost could potentially be achieved under the concept.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1559-0291
Volume :
161
Issue :
1-8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Applied biochemistry and biotechnology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
19946759
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8869-4