Back to Search
Start Over
Fixed versus mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: a meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR [Orthop Traumatol Surg Res] 2009 Dec; Vol. 95 (8), pp. 599-605. - Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- This systematic review compares the clinical, radiological and kinematic outcomes of fixed compared to mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs). A meta-analysis of pooled mean difference and relative risk data was undertaken following a review of electronic databases. Five studies were identified. Analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in clinical outcome or complication rate between mobile and fixed bearing UKR. However, the evidence reviewed presented with a number of methodological limitations. Areas for further study are recommended.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis, Knee surgery
Postoperative Complications physiopathology
Prosthesis Failure
Radiography
Reoperation
Risk Assessment
Stress, Mechanical
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee methods
Knee Prosthesis
Prosthesis Design
Weight-Bearing
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1877-0568
- Volume :
- 95
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 19942491
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.10.006