Back to Search
Start Over
Immediate vs delayed intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a randomized clinical trial.
- Source :
-
JAMA [JAMA] 2009 Sep 02; Vol. 302 (9), pp. 947-54. - Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- Context: International guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy for patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, but the optimal timing of intervention is uncertain.<br />Objective: To determine whether immediate intervention on admission can result in a reduction of myocardial infarction compared with a delayed intervention.<br />Design, Setting, and Patients: The Angioplasty to Blunt the Rise of Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized for an Immediate or Delayed Intervention (ABOARD) study, a randomized clinical trial that assigned, from August 2006 through September 2008 at 13 centers in France, 352 patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation and a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 3 or more to receive intervention either immediately or on the next working day (between 8 and 60 hours after enrollment).<br />Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was the peak troponin value during hospitalization; the key secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 1-month follow-up.<br />Results: Time from randomization to sheath insertion was 70 minutes with immediate intervention vs 21 hours with delayed intervention. The primary end point did not differ between the 2 strategies (median [interquartile range] troponin I value, 2.1 [0.3-7.1] ng/mL vs 1.7 [0.3-7.2] ng/mL in the immediate and delayed intervention groups, respectively; P = .70). The key secondary end point was observed in 13.7% (95% confidence interval, 8.6%-18.8%) of the group assigned to receive immediate intervention and 10.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.7%-14.6%) of the group assigned to receive delayed intervention (P = .31). The other end points, as well as major bleeding, did not differ between the 2 strategies.<br />Conclusion: In patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, a strategy of immediate intervention compared with a strategy of intervention deferred to the next working day (mean, 21 hours) did not result in a difference in myocardial infarction as defined by peak troponin level.<br />Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00442949.
- Subjects :
- Abciximab
Acute Coronary Syndrome blood
Acute Coronary Syndrome mortality
Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use
Anticoagulants therapeutic use
Cardiac Catheterization
Coronary Artery Bypass
Female
Hemorrhage epidemiology
Hospitalization
Humans
Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction blood
Myocardial Infarction mortality
Myocardial Infarction prevention & control
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Troponin blood
Acute Coronary Syndrome therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1538-3598
- Volume :
- 302
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JAMA
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 19724041
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1267