Apparent marked reduction in early antivenom reactions compared to historical controls: was it prophylaxis or method of administration?

MLA

Caron, Elena J., et al. “Apparent Marked Reduction in Early Antivenom Reactions Compared to Historical Controls: Was It Prophylaxis or Method of Administration?” Toxicon : Official Journal of the International Society on Toxinology, vol. 54, no. 6, Nov. 2009, pp. 779–83. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.06.001.

APA

Caron, E. J., Manock, S. R., Maudlin, J., Koleski, J., Theakston, R. D. G., Warrell, D. A., & Smalligan, R. D. (2009). Apparent marked reduction in early antivenom reactions compared to historical controls: was it prophylaxis or method of administration? Toxicon : Official Journal of the International Society on Toxinology, 54(6), 779–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.06.001

Chicago

Caron, Elena J, Stephen R Manock, Jeffrey Maudlin, Jerome Koleski, R David G Theakston, David A Warrell, and Roger D Smalligan. 2009. “Apparent Marked Reduction in Early Antivenom Reactions Compared to Historical Controls: Was It Prophylaxis or Method of Administration?” Toxicon : Official Journal of the International Society on Toxinology 54 (6): 779–83. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.06.001.