Back to Search
Start Over
Relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for adolescent depression: 36-week results from the TADS randomized trial.
- Source :
-
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry [J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry] 2009 Jul; Vol. 48 (7), pp. 711-720. - Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- Objective: The cost-effectiveness of three active interventions for major depression in adolescents was compared after 36 weeks of treatment in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study.<br />Method: Outpatients aged 12 to 18 years with a primary diagnosis of major depression participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted at 13 U.S. academic and community clinics from 2000 to 2004. Three hundred twenty-seven participants randomized to 1 of 3 active treatment arms, fluoxetine alone (n = 109), cognitive-behavioral therapy (n = 111) alone, or their combination (n = 107), were evaluated for a 3-month acute treatment and a 6-month continuation/maintenance treatment period. Costs of services received for the 36 weeks were estimated and examined in relation to the number of depression-free days and quality-adjusted life-years. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were also generated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess treatment differences on the quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness measures.<br />Results: Cognitive-behavioral therapy was the most costly treatment component (mean $1,787 [in monotherapy] and $1,833 [in combination therapy], median $1,923 [for both]). Reflecting higher direct and indirect costs associated with psychiatric hospital use, the costs of services received outside Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study in fluoxetine-treated patients (mean $5,382, median $2,341) were significantly higher than those in participants treated with cognitive-behavioral therapy (mean $3,102, median $1,373) or combination (mean $2,705, median $927). Accordingly, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicate that combination treatment is highly likely (>90%) to be more cost-effective than fluoxetine alone at 36 weeks. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is not likely to be more cost-effective than fluoxetine.<br />Conclusions: These findings support the use of combination treatment in adolescents with depression over monotherapy.
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Child
Combined Modality Therapy economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis statistics & numerical data
Double-Blind Method
Drug Costs statistics & numerical data
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hospitalization economics
Humans
Male
Personality Assessment statistics & numerical data
Psychometrics
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation economics
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation therapeutic use
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy economics
Depressive Disorder, Major economics
Depressive Disorder, Major therapy
Fluoxetine economics
Fluoxetine therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-5418
- Volume :
- 48
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 19465880
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181a2b319