Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes and complications with off-label use of drug-eluting stents: results from the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) group.

Authors :
Brodie BR
Stuckey T
Downey W
Humphrey A
Bradshaw B
Metzger C
Hermiller J
Krainin F
Juk S
Cheek B
Duffy P
Smith H
Edmunds J
Varanasi J
Simonton CA
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2008 Aug; Vol. 1 (4), pp. 405-14.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates outcomes and complications in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) for "off-label" indications.<br />Background: Drug-eluting stents have been effective in randomized trials, but their safety and efficacy for off-label indications has not been well studied.<br />Methods: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Registry is the largest multicenter U.S. registry evaluating outcomes of DES. Off-label indications included ostial, left main, long, bifurcation, and in-stent restenotic lesions, saphenous vein grafts, chronic total occlusions, small or large vessels, multilesion or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Outcomes were adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity analyses.<br />Results: Drug-eluting stents were used in an off-label manner in 59% of patients. The patients who received off-label treatment were more often male, had a higher incidence of prior infarction and bypass surgery, and lower ejection fractions. Off-label versus "on-label" use of DES was associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis at 9 months and 2 years. Off-label use of DES compared with off-label use of bare-metal stents (BMS) had lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months and 2 years and lower rates of stent thrombosis at 9 months.<br />Conclusions: Off-label use of DES is associated with higher event rates compared with on-label use of DES, which is consistent with a higher risk clinical and lesion profile. However, event rates with off-label use of DES are lower compared with off-label use of BMS. Pending results from randomized trials, our data support the use of DES for off-label indications in selected patients.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-7605
Volume :
1
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
19463338
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.005