Back to Search
Start Over
Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study.
- Source :
-
Blood pressure monitoring [Blood Press Monit] 2009 Jun; Vol. 14 (3), pp. 112-20. - Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- Background: Previous studies using the combination of angiotensin-receptor blockers and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) have shown superior ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) reduction in study participants with stage 2 hypertension compared with monotherapy.<br />Objective: This multicenter, double-blind, parallel group, forced-titration study of individuals with stage 2 hypertension, compared the efficacy of valsartan and amlodipine in combination with HCTZ on ABP reduction.<br />Methods: After a 2-week washout period, participants (n=482) with mean office sitting systolic BP >or=160 mmHg and <or=200 mmHg were randomized to receive treatment with either valsartan 160 mg (n=241) or amlodipine 5 mg (n=241), force-titrated to a maximum dose of valsartan/HCTZ 320/25 mg or amlodipine/HCTZ 10/25 mg over 6 weeks and continued through week 10. The primary endpoint was change in mean 24-h ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to week 10.<br />Results: At week 10, changes from baseline in mean office BP were significantly (P<0.0001) decreased by both valsartan/HCTZ (-34.2/-14.2 mmHg) and amlodipine/HCTZ (-34.1/-14.7 mmHg). Changes from baseline in mean 24-h ABP were significantly (P<0.0001) decreased by both valsartan/HCTZ (-21.1/-12.5 mmHg) and amlodipine/HCTZ (-18.1/-9.9 mmHg). However, treatment with valsartan/HCTZ provided significant additional systolic BP (-3.8 mmHg; P=0.0042) and diastolic BP (-2.7 mmHg; P=0.0002) reduction compared with the amlodipine/HCTZ group. The proportion of individuals reaching the office goal BP (<140/80 mmHg) were similar in the valsartan/HCTZ (55.3%) versus amlodipine/HCTZ (54.9%) group, ABP control rates for the recommended ABP goal (<130/80 mmHg) were greater (P=0.0170) in the valsartan/HCTZ group (54.3%) than the amlodipine/HCTZ group (42.7%). Both treatments were well tolerated.<br />Conclusion: On the basis of ABP monitoring but not office measurements, the fixed-dose combination of valsartan/HCTZ is a significantly more effective treatment regimen than amlodipine/HCTZ, with similar tolerability.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Antihypertensive Agents administration & dosage
Blood Pressure drug effects
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
Diuretics administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Treatment Outcome
Valine administration & dosage
Valsartan
Amlodipine administration & dosage
Hydrochlorothiazide administration & dosage
Hypertension drug therapy
Tetrazoles administration & dosage
Valine analogs & derivatives
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1473-5725
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Blood pressure monitoring
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 19384192
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832a9da7