Back to Search Start Over

Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions.

Authors :
Alexander MS
Anderson KD
Biering-Sorensen F
Blight AR
Brannon R
Bryce TN
Creasey G
Catz A
Curt A
Donovan W
Ditunno J
Ellaway P
Finnerup NB
Graves DE
Haynes BA
Heinemann AW
Jackson AB
Johnston MV
Kalpakjian CZ
Kleitman N
Krassioukov A
Krogh K
Lammertse D
Magasi S
Mulcahey MJ
Schurch B
Sherwood A
Steeves JD
Stiens S
Tulsky DS
van Hedel HJ
Whiteneck G
Source :
Spinal cord [Spinal Cord] 2009 Aug; Vol. 47 (8), pp. 582-91. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Apr 21.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Study Design: Review by the spinal cord outcomes partnership endeavor (SCOPE), which is a broad-based international consortium of scientists and clinical researchers representing academic institutions, industry, government agencies, not-for-profit organizations and foundations.<br />Objectives: Assessment of current and evolving tools for evaluating human spinal cord injury (SCI) outcomes for both clinical diagnosis and clinical research studies.<br />Methods: a framework for the appraisal of evidence of metric properties was used to examine outcome tools or tests for accuracy, sensitivity, reliability and validity for human SCI.<br />Results: Imaging, neurological, functional, autonomic, sexual health, bladder/bowel, pain and psychosocial tools were evaluated. Several specific tools for human SCI studies have or are being developed to allow the more accurate determination for a clinically meaningful benefit (improvement in functional outcome or quality of life) being achieved as a result of a therapeutic intervention.<br />Conclusion: Significant progress has been made, but further validation studies are required to identify the most appropriate tools for specific targets in a human SCI study or clinical trial.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-5624
Volume :
47
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Spinal cord
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
19381157
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.18