Back to Search Start Over

Potential impact of adjusting the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer based on pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors :
Kabrhel C
Mark Courtney D
Camargo CA Jr
Moore CL
Richman PB
Plewa MC
Nordenholtz KE
Smithline HA
Beam DM
Brown MD
Kline JA
Source :
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [Acad Emerg Med] 2009 Apr; Vol. 16 (4), pp. 325-32. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Mar 06.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Objectives: The utility of D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) can be limited by test specificity. The authors tested if the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer can be varied according to pretest probability (PTP) of PE to increase specificity while maintaining a negative predictive value (NPV) of >99%.<br />Methods: This was a prospective, observational multicenter study of emergency department (ED) patients in the United States. Eligible patients had a diagnostic study ordered to evaluate possible PE. PTP was determined by the clinician's unstructured estimate and the Wells score. Five different D-dimer assays were used. D-dimer test performance was measured using 1) standard thresholds and 2) variable threshold values: twice (for low PTP patients), equal (intermediate PTP patients), or half (high PTP patients) of standard threshold. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 45 days required positive imaging plus decision to treat.<br />Results: The authors enrolled 7,940 patients tested for PE, and clinicians ordered a quantitative D-dimer for 4,357 (55%) patients who had PTPs distributed as follows: low (74%), moderate (21%), or high (4%). At standard cutoffs, across all PTP strata, quantitative D-dimer testing had a test sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 91% to 97%), specificity of 58% (95% CI = 56% to 60%), and NPV of 99.5% (95% CI = 99.1% to 99.7%). If variable cutoffs had been used the overall sensitivity would have been 88% (95% CI = 83% to 92%), specificity 75% (95% CI = 74% to 76%), and NPV 99.1% (95% CI = 98.7% to 99.4%).<br />Conclusions: This large multicenter observational sample demonstrates that emergency medicine clinicians currently order a D-dimer in the majority of patients tested for PE, including a large proportion with intermediate PTP and high PTP. Varying the D-dimer's cutoff according to PTP can increase specificity with no measurable decrease in NPV.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1553-2712
Volume :
16
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
19298619
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00368.x