Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of cemented vs uncemented acetabular component positioning using an imageless navigation system.

Authors :
Chawda M
Hucker P
Whitehouse SL
Crawford RW
English H
Donnelly WJ
Source :
The Journal of arthroplasty [J Arthroplasty] 2009 Dec; Vol. 24 (8), pp. 1170-3. Date of Electronic Publication: 2008 Dec 04.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Hip navigation was used as an assessment tool to compare ability to reproduce trial and definitive acetabular placement in total hip arthroplasty, using cemented and uncemented components. We demonstrated a significant difference in reproducibility between components. Of 20 uncemented cups, 4 (20%) deviated from the target inclination by 5 degrees or more compared to none of 21 in the cemented group (P = .048). Of the 20 uncemented cups, 7 (35%) deviated from the target version by 5 degrees or more compared to none of 21 in the cemented group (P = .003). This may explain higher rates of revision for dislocation with uncemented components. There was also a significant difference between the groups with regard to deviation from planned leg length (P < .001).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-8406
Volume :
24
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of arthroplasty
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
19056209
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.018