Back to Search Start Over

Critical evaluation of connectivity-based point of care testing systems of glucose in a hospital environment.

Authors :
Floré KM
Fiers T
Delanghe JR
Source :
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine [Clin Chem Lab Med] 2008; Vol. 46 (12), pp. 1763-8.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Background: In recent years a number of point of care testing (POCT) glucometers were introduced on the market. We investigated the analytical variability (lot-to-lot variation, calibration error, inter-instrument and inter-operator variability) of glucose POCT systems in a university hospital environment and compared these results with the analytical needs required for tight glucose monitoring.<br />Methods: The reference hexokinase method was compared to different POCT systems based on glucose oxidase (blood gas instruments) or glucose dehydrogenase (handheld glucometers). Based upon daily internal quality control data, total errors were calculated for the various glucose methods and the analytical variability of the glucometers was estimated.<br />Results: The total error of the glucometers exceeded by far the desirable analytical specifications (based on a biological variability model). Lot-to-lot variation, inter-instrument variation and inter-operator variability contributed approximately equally to total variance. As in a hospital environment, distribution of hematocrit values is broad, converting blood glucose into plasma values using a fixed factor further increases variance. The percentage of outliers exceeded the ISO 15197 criteria in a broad glucose concentration range.<br />Conclusions: Total analytical variation of handheld glucometers is larger than expected. Clinicians should be aware that the variability of glucose measurements obtained by blood gas instruments is lower than results obtained with handheld glucometers on capillary blood.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1434-6621
Volume :
46
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
19055453
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.332