Cite
Cost-benefit analysis of pharmacologic erection program (PEP) versus penile prosthesis.
MLA
Buch, J. P., et al. “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Pharmacologic Erection Program (PEP) versus Penile Prosthesis.” Urology, vol. 37, no. 2, Feb. 1991, pp. 116–18. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(91)80204-k.
APA
Buch, J. P., Zorn, B. H., & Taylor, R. J. (1991). Cost-benefit analysis of pharmacologic erection program (PEP) versus penile prosthesis. Urology, 37(2), 116–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(91)80204-k
Chicago
Buch, J P, B H Zorn, and R J Taylor. 1991. “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Pharmacologic Erection Program (PEP) versus Penile Prosthesis.” Urology 37 (2): 116–18. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(91)80204-k.