Back to Search
Start Over
Effectiveness of a mucolythic agent as a local adjuvant in revision lumbar spine surgery.
- Source :
-
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society [Eur Spine J] 2008 Dec; Vol. 17 (12), pp. 1752-6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2008 Oct 07. - Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- Aim of this prospective randomized trial was to analyze the effectiveness of MESNA in chemical dissection of peridural fibrosis in patients who underwent revision lumbar spine surgery. Between January 2003 and October 2006, 30 patients who underwent revision lumbar spine surgery were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a study group (A) and a control group (B). Once peridural fibrosis was exposed, MESNA (Uromixetan MESNA, 50 mg/ml) was intraoperatively applied on the fibrous tissue (Group A) to ease tissue dissection and enter the canal. In patients of Group B, saline solution was used. Surgical time, preoperative and 1 week postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), length of hospitalization (days), and incidence of perioperative complications were evaluated. The blinded surgeon assigned the surgeries to one of four categories as none, minimal, moderate, and severe basing on intraoperative difficulty in dissecting the fibrous tissue and intraoperative bleeding. Statistical analysis used chi-square analysis to evaluate the difference in surgery difficulty and the incidence of intraoperative complications between the two groups. The analysis of surgical time and hemoglobin levels was performed using a one-sample Wilcoxon test and Mann-Whitney U test. Patients in whom MESNA was used intraoperatively (Group A) presented better intraoperative and perioperative parameters with respect to the control group. Average surgical time and decrease in Hb postoperatively were more in the saline group (B) respect to MESNA (A) (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001, respectively), while no difference in average hospital stay was reported between the two groups. Surgeon-blinded intraoperative report on surgical difficulty showed a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, no complications directly attributable to the use of MESNA were experienced. The incidence of dural tears and intraoperative bleeding from epidural veins were significantly less in Group A with respect to the control group. MESNA contributed significantly to reduce the operative complications, with a diminution of the surgical time and the grade of difficult for the surgeon, confirming its ability as chemical dissector also for epidural fibrosis in revision lumbar spine surgery.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Cicatrix drug therapy
Cicatrix etiology
Cicatrix physiopathology
Dissection methods
Dura Mater injuries
Dura Mater pathology
Dura Mater surgery
Epidural Space drug effects
Epidural Space pathology
Epidural Space surgery
Expectorants administration & dosage
Female
Fibrosis etiology
Fibrosis physiopathology
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care methods
Postoperative Hemorrhage etiology
Postoperative Hemorrhage prevention & control
Prospective Studies
Protective Agents administration & dosage
Spinal Canal drug effects
Spinal Canal pathology
Spinal Canal surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome surgery
Fibrosis drug therapy
Lumbar Vertebrae surgery
Mesna administration & dosage
Neurosurgical Procedures methods
Reoperation methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1432-0932
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 18839224
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0802-y