Back to Search Start Over

NEAT: National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial--toxicity, delivered dose intensity and quality of life.

Authors :
Earl HM
Hiller L
Dunn JA
Bathers S
Harvey P
Stanley A
Grieve RJ
Agrawal RK
Fernando IN
Brunt AM
McAdam K
O'Reilly S
Rea DW
Spooner D
Poole CJ
Source :
British journal of cancer [Br J Cancer] 2008 Oct 21; Vol. 99 (8), pp. 1226-31. Date of Electronic Publication: 2008 Sep 16.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

The NEAT trial reported considerable benefit for ECMF (epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) of 28% for relapse-free survival (RFS) and 30% for overall survival (OS), when compared with classical CMF in early breast cancer. To assess tolerability, toxicity, dose intensity and quality of life (QoL) analyses were undertaken. All 2021 eligible patients had common toxicity criteria (CTC), delivered chemotherapy and supportive treatments details and long-term morbidities recorded. The QoL substudy used multiple validated measures. ECMF produced low CTC scores, although higher than CMF for nausea, vomiting, alopecia, constipation, stomatitis (P<0.001), infection (P=0.001) and fatigue (P=0.03). Supportive treatments required, however, were similar across randomised treatments. On-treatment deaths were more common with CMF (13) than ECMF(5). Optimal course-delivered dose intensity (CDDI > or =85%) was received more often by ECMF patients (83 vs 76%: P=0.0002), and was associated with better RFS (P=0.0006). QoL over 2 years was equivalent across treatments, despite minimally worse side effects for ECMF during treatment. ECMF benefit spanned all levels of toxicity, CDDI and QoL. There are no reported acute myeloid leukaemias or cardiac dysfunctions. ECMF is tolerable, deliverable, and significantly more effective than CMF, with no serious long-term toxicity or QoL detriment.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-1827
Volume :
99
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
British journal of cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
18797468
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604674