Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of ketorolac 0.4% and bromfenac 0.09% at trough dosing: aqueous drug absorption and prostaglandin E2 levels.

Authors :
Bucci FA Jr
Waterbury LD
Source :
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [J Cataract Refract Surg] 2008 Sep; Vol. 34 (9), pp. 1509-12.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Purpose: To compare aqueous drug concentrations and prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) levels in patients treated with ketorolac 0.4% and bromfenac 0.09% at trough dosing.<br />Setting: Private practice, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, USA.<br />Methods: This single-center randomized investigator-masked clinical study comprised 56 patients having cataract surgery. Patients received 1 drop of ketorolac 0.4% or bromfenac 0.09% 6 hours and 12 hours preoperatively consistent with on-label dosing schedules. Aqueous humor was collected at the start of surgery and analyzed for concentrations of ketorolac and bromfenac using a reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy system and for PGE(2) levels by competitive enzyme immunoassay.<br />Results: The mean aqueous PGE(2) level was 204.2 pg/mL +/- 95.5 (SD) in patients treated with ketorolac 0.4% and 263.7 +/- 90.0 pg/mL in patients treated with bromfenac 0.09%, (P = .020). The mean aqueous concentration of ketorolac and bromfenac at trough dosing was 130.5 +/- 37.8 ng/mL and 6.2 +/- 3.1 ng/mL, respectively (P = .004).<br />Conclusions: Higher aqueous levels and greater PGE(2) inhibition were observed in cataract surgery patients treated with ketorolac 0.4% than in patients treated with bromfenac 0.09% at trough dosing. These findings suggest that ketorolac 0.4% administered 4 times a day may provide better control of prostaglandin-mediated inflammation than bromfenac 0.09% administered twice a day.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0886-3350
Volume :
34
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
18721711
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.023