Back to Search Start Over

Detection and restaging of residual and/or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after chemotherapy and radiation therapy: comparison of MR imaging and FDG PET/CT.

Authors :
Comoretto M
Balestreri L
Borsatti E
Cimitan M
Franchin G
Lise M
Source :
Radiology [Radiology] 2008 Oct; Vol. 249 (1), pp. 203-11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2008 Aug 18.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and combined fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), alone and in combination, in detection and restaging treated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).<br />Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed after institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Sixty-three consecutive patients treated for NPC underwent follow-up with both MR imaging and FDG PET/CT. Findings were evaluated according to the TNM classification. Final diagnosis was confirmed at biopsy or imaging follow-up for at least 6 months. Proportions and their 95% confidence intervals were computed; for comparison of data obtained separately from MR imaging and FDG PET/CT and those obtained from their combined use, the McNemar test was used. P < .05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.<br />Results: There was a trend toward greater overall accuracy of MR over PET/CT in detecting residual and/or recurrent NPC at the primary site; 92.1% (58 of 63 patients) for MR versus 85.7% (54 of 63) for FDG PET/CT (P = .16). Overall accuracy for tumor restaging was 74.6% (47 of 63) for MR and 73.0% (46 of 63) for FDG PET/CT (either modality used alone), but the overall combined accuracy was 92.1% (58 of 63) (all P values < .01).<br />Conclusion: MR imaging demonstrated a trend toward higher accuracy than did FDG PET/CT in detecting residual and/or recurrent NPC at the primary tumor site. The combined use of MR and FDG PET/CT was more accurate for tumor restaging than when either modality was used independently.<br /> ((c) RSNA, 2008.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-1315
Volume :
249
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
18710963
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2491071753