Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone or followed by Paclitaxel for early breast cancer.
- Source :
-
Journal of the National Cancer Institute [J Natl Cancer Inst] 2008 Jun 04; Vol. 100 (11), pp. 805-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2008 May 27. - Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- Background: Taxanes are among the most active drugs for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and, as a consequence, they have also been studied in the adjuvant setting.<br />Methods: After breast cancer surgery, women with lymph node-positive disease were randomly assigned to treatment with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) or with FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel (FEC-P). The primary endpoint of study-5-year disease-free survival (DFS)-was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and analysis of the prognostic and predictive value of clinical and molecular (hormone receptors by immunohistochemistry and HER2 by fluorescence in situ hybridization) markers. Associations and interactions were assessed with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model for DFS for the following covariates: age, menopausal status, tumor size, lymph node status, type of chemotherapy, tumor size, positive lymph nodes, HER2 status, and hormone receptor status. All statistical tests were two-sided.<br />Results: Among the 1246 eligible patients, estimated rates of DFS at 5 years were 78.5% in the FEC-P arm and 72.1% in the FEC arm (difference = 6.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6% to 11.2%; P = .006). FEC-P treatment was associated with a 23% reduction in the risk of relapse compared with FEC treatment (146 relapses in the 614 patients in the FEC-P arm vs 193 relapses in the 632 patients in the FEC arm, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.95; P = .022) and a 22% reduction in the risk of death (73 and 95 deaths, respectively, HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.06; P = .110). Among the 928 patients for whom tumor samples were centrally analyzed, type of chemotherapy (FEC vs FEC-P) (P = .017), number of involved axillary lymph nodes (P < .001), tumor size (P = .020), hormone receptor status (P = .004), and HER2 status (P = .006) were all associated with DFS. We found no statistically significant interaction between HER2 status and paclitaxel treatment or between hormone receptor status and paclitaxel treatment.<br />Conclusions: Among patients with operable breast cancer, FEC-P treatment statistically significantly reduced the risk of relapse compared with FEC as adjuvant therapy.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic adverse effects
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects
Breast Neoplasms chemistry
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast drug therapy
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast secondary
Carcinoma, Lobular drug therapy
Carcinoma, Lobular secondary
Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Administration Schedule
Epirubicin administration & dosage
Female
Fluorouracil administration & dosage
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Infusions, Intravenous
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Paclitaxel administration & dosage
Paclitaxel adverse effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Receptor, ErbB-2 analysis
Receptors, Estrogen analysis
Receptors, Progesterone analysis
Treatment Outcome
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor analysis
Breast Neoplasms drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms pathology
Paclitaxel therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1460-2105
- Volume :
- 100
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 18505968
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn151