Back to Search
Start Over
Use of an absorbent dressing specifically for fecal incontinence.
- Source :
-
Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society [J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs] 2008 Mar-Apr; Vol. 35 (2), pp. 221-8. - Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Use of an absorbent product is a self-care strategy for managing fecal incontinence that protects against visible soiling. The purpose of this study was to examine use of a small surgical dressing that can be placed between the buttocks to absorb leaked feces.<br />Design: Cross-sectional survey.<br />Subjects and Setting: A survey was mailed to 75 randomly selected community-living people in 25 states and the District of Columbia, who ordered the dressing more than once within the past year. Thirty-six people (age = 55 +/- 16 years mean +/- SD), 57% men and 94% white responded.<br />Instrument: A 48-question survey that included questions asked about demographics and general health, emotional states (eg, anxiety and depression), bowel pattern and incontinence, quality of life, and use of an anorectal dressing was developed for this study. The survey also contained 2 tools, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life instrument. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index is a tool that enables valid assessment of fecal incontinence severity using patient recall of symptoms of frequency and type of bowel leakage. The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life instrument results in a valid and reliable evaluation of fecal incontinence-specific quality of life using 4 domains of lifestyle, coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment.<br />Results: The fecal incontinence severity score was 28 +/- 14 (mean +/- SD); 79% leaked loose/liquid feces, 50% leaked daily, and leaked feces remained between the buttocks in 64%; 21% also leaked urine. Eighty-five percent experienced incontinence-associated dermatitis. Of those who used the dressing, 50% were men. The anorectal dressing was preferred to a pad by 92%, prevented soiling in 88%, and its ability to stay in place was rated very good or good by 76%. Eighty percent of respondents rated the dressing's comfort very good or good; 85% rated its overall effectiveness very good or good. Use of the dressing lessened anxiety about fecal soiling in 81% and was thought to improve quality of life in 76%.<br />Conclusion: An anorectal dressing offers an effective, comfortable alternative to a pad for absorbing leaked feces that seems acceptable to men.
- Subjects :
- Activities of Daily Living psychology
Adaptation, Psychological
Aged
Anxiety etiology
Anxiety prevention & control
Anxiety psychology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Quality of Life psychology
Self Care instrumentation
Self Care psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Fecal Incontinence prevention & control
Fecal Incontinence psychology
Incontinence Pads psychology
Patient Satisfaction
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1071-5754
- Volume :
- 35
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 18344799
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000313647.44870.9a