Back to Search Start Over

Effects of gender and cigarette smoking on reactivity to psychological and pharmacological stress provocation.

Authors :
Back SE
Waldrop AE
Saladin ME
Yeatts SD
Simpson A
McRae AL
Upadhyaya HP
Contini Sisson R
Spratt EG
Allen J
Kreek MJ
Brady KT
Source :
Psychoneuroendocrinology [Psychoneuroendocrinology] 2008 Jun; Vol. 33 (5), pp. 560-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2008 Mar 05.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

We examined the influence of gender and smoking status on reactivity in two human laboratory stress paradigms. Participants were 46 (21 men, 25 women) healthy individuals who completed the Trier Social Stress Task (i.e., performed speech and math calculations in front of an audience) and a pharmacological stress provocation (i.e., administration of corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH)) after an overnight hospital stay. Approximately half (53%) of the participants were smokers. Cortisol, adrenocorticotrophin hormone (ACTH), physiologic measures (heart rate, blood pressure), and subjective stress were assessed at baseline and at several time points post-task. Men demonstrated higher baseline ACTH and blood pressure as compared to women; however, ACTH and blood pressure responses were more pronounced in women. Women smokers evidenced a more blunted cortisol response as compared to non-smoking women, whereas smoking status did not affect the cortisol response in men. Finally, there was a more robust cardiovascular and subjective response to the Trier as compared to the CRH. Although preliminary, the findings suggest that women may be more sensitive than men to the impact of cigarette smoking on cortisol response. In addition, there is some evidence for a more robust neuroendocrine and physiologic response to acute laboratory stress in women as compared to men.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0306-4530
Volume :
33
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
18321653
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.01.012