Back to Search Start Over

Mode of cembranoid action on embryonic muscle acetylcholine receptor.

Authors :
Ulrich H
Akk G
Nery AA
Trujillo CA
Rodriguez AD
Eterović VA
Source :
Journal of neuroscience research [J Neurosci Res] 2008 Jan; Vol. 86 (1), pp. 93-107.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

The mechanism of eupalmerin acetate (EUAC) actions on the embryonic muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in BC3H-1 cells was studied by using whole-cell and single-channel patch-clamp current measurements. With whole-cell currents, EUAC did not act as an agonist on this receptor. Coapplication of 30 microM EUAC with 50 microM, 100 microM, or 500 microM carbamoylcholine (CCh) reversibly inhibited the current amplitude, whereas, with 20 microM CCh, current was increased above control values in the presence of EUAC. EUAC concentration curves (0.01-40 microM) obtained with 100 microM and 500 microM CCh displayed slope coefficients, n(H), significantly smaller than one, suggesting that EUAC bound to several sites with widely differing affinities on the receptor molecule. The apparent rate of receptor desensitization in the presence of EUAC and CCh was either slower than or equal to that obtained with CCh alone. The major finding from single-channel studies was that EUAC did not affect single-channel conductance or the ability of CCh to interact with the receptor. Instead, EUAC acted by increasing the channel closing rate constant. The results are not consistent with the competitive model for EUAC inhibition, with the sequential open-channel block model, or with inhibition by increased desensitization. The data are best accounted for by a model in which EUAC acts by closed-channel block at low concentrations, by positive modulation at intermediate concentrations, and by negative allosteric modulation of the open channel at high concentrations.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0360-4012
Volume :
86
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neuroscience research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
17868151
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.21468