Back to Search
Start Over
Ototoxicity in a randomized phase III trial of intra-arterial compared with intravenous cisplatin chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2007 Aug 20; Vol. 25 (24), pp. 3759-65. - Publication Year :
- 2007
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Cisplatin concomitantly administered with radiotherapy is increasingly used in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We aimed to compare the incidence of hearing loss between patients treated with intra-arterial high-dose cisplatin chemoradiation with sodium thiosulfate (CRT-IA) and intravenous high-dose cisplatin chemoradiation without sodium thiosulfate (CRT-IV).<br />Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of hearing thresholds at low and (ultra-) high frequencies obtained before, during, and after treatment in 158 patients. Patients were randomly assigned for either CRT-IA (150 mg/m(2), four courses) with sodium thiosulfate cisplatin neutralization or CRT-IV (100 mg/m(2), three courses) without rescue. All patients received concomitant radiation therapy (RT; 70 Gy).<br />Results: CRT-IA resulted in approximately 10% less hearing loss at frequencies vital for speech perception, compared with CRT-IV (P < .001). In CRT-IA, fewer ears qualified for hearing aids (36% v 49%; P = .03). However, in both treatment arms, the incidence expressed in National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (version 3) did not deviate (P > .14). Age, cumulative cisplatin dose, cumulative RT dose, and the considered frequency area determine the degree of hearing loss (P < .001). Cisplatin induced increasing hearing loss of 24% to 60% with increasing frequencies. RT induced hearing loss at speech frequencies of 9% to 12%.<br />Conclusion: Depending on the criteria used to assess hearing loss due to treatment, differences in ototoxicity between CRT-IA and CRT-IV were found in favor of CRT-IA. It is desirable to specify hearing loss criteria toward frequencies vital for speech perception, and to refine grading scales to reveal subtle and clinically relevant dissimilarities in ototoxicity between different treatment protocols.
- Subjects :
- Auditory Threshold
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell drug therapy
Cisplatin administration & dosage
Combined Modality Therapy
Ear, Inner drug effects
Ear, Inner radiation effects
Female
Head and Neck Neoplasms blood supply
Head and Neck Neoplasms radiotherapy
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural chemically induced
Humans
Infusions, Intra-Arterial
Infusions, Intravenous
Male
Radiotherapy Dosage
Thiosulfates administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell radiotherapy
Cisplatin adverse effects
Head and Neck Neoplasms drug therapy
Hearing Loss chemically induced
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-7755
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 24
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 17704425
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9540