Comparison of different MRI techniques for the assessment of thoracic aortic pathology: 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography, turbo spin echo and balanced steady state free precession.

MLA

Gebker, Rolf, et al. “Comparison of Different MRI Techniques for the Assessment of Thoracic Aortic Pathology: 3D Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography, Turbo Spin Echo and Balanced Steady State Free Precession.” The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 23, no. 6, Dec. 2007, pp. 747–56. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9204-6.

APA

Gebker, R., Gomaa, O., Schnackenburg, B., Rebakowski, J., Fleck, E., & Nagel, E. (2007). Comparison of different MRI techniques for the assessment of thoracic aortic pathology: 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography, turbo spin echo and balanced steady state free precession. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 23(6), 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9204-6

Chicago

Gebker, Rolf, Osama Gomaa, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Janina Rebakowski, Eckart Fleck, and Eike Nagel. 2007. “Comparison of Different MRI Techniques for the Assessment of Thoracic Aortic Pathology: 3D Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography, Turbo Spin Echo and Balanced Steady State Free Precession.” The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 23 (6): 747–56. doi:10.1007/s10554-006-9204-6.