[Tissue resistance: what about tension-free?].

Objectives: The purpose is to quantify objective tissue resistances before healing of prostheses used in pelvic floor surgery.
Patients and Methods: We measured tissue resistances offered to five types of meshes by four classical surgical routes. We also tested the incidence of the modification of the width of meshes on tissue resistance. This study was realized on frozen cadavers, by pull on prostheses just after implantation. Tests are realized with a dynamometer and results obtained in Newton.
Results: In the Retzius space, TVT offers a better resistance than IVS or LIFT meshes. We did not bring to the fore a significant difference between four routes for 1 cm wide prosthesis. The increase of width of Prolene meshes improves their resistance in tissues and thus quality of their fixation. We underscore a better resistance of the trans sacrospinous route with regard to the trans muscular one.
Discussion and Conclusion: The increase of resistance is bound to the increase of the contact area between the prosthesis and the tissues. This increase of resistance should be taken into account in prolapse surgery: constraints are stronger than for stress incontinence. The posterior arms of meshes have to measure more than 1 cm wide and be set up through the sacrospinous ligament rather than through the elevator muscles. The type of knitting of prostheses is important and influences the resistance in tissues in the immediate postoperative time. Manufacturers should be interested in conceiving specific meshes for the tension-free fixation, with special and adapted mechanical properties.