Back to Search Start Over

A randomized study of the effects of gabapentin on postamputation pain.

Authors :
Nikolajsen L
Finnerup NB
Kramp S
Vimtrup AS
Keller J
Jensen TS
Source :
Anesthesiology [Anesthesiology] 2006 Nov; Vol. 105 (5), pp. 1008-15.
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Background: Pain after amputation is common but difficult to treat. Therefore, the authors examined whether postoperative treatment with gabapentin could reduce postamputation stump and phantom pain.<br />Methods: Forty-six patients scheduled to undergo lower limb amputation were randomly assigned to receive oral gabapentin or placebo. Treatment was started on the first postoperative day and continued for 30 days. The daily dose of gabapentin or placebo was gradually increased to 2,400 mg/day. The intensity of stump and phantom pain was recorded every day on a numeric rating scale (0-10) during the 30-day treatment period. Five interviews were performed after 7, 14, and 30 days and after 3 and 6 months.<br />Results: Results from 41 patients were included in the data analysis. The risk of phantom pain (gabapentin vs. placebo) was 55.0% versus 52.6% (risk difference, 2.4%; 95% confidence interval, -28.9 to 33.7%; P = 0.88; 30 days) and 58.8% versus 50.0% (risk difference, 8.8%; 95% confidence interval, -23.3 to 40.9%; P = 0.59; 6 months). The median intensity of phantom pain (gabapentin vs. placebo) was 1.5 (range, 0-9.0) versus 1.2 (range, 0-6.6) (P = 0.60; 30 days) and 1.0 (range, 0-6.0) versus 0.5 (range, 0-5.0) (P = 0.77; 6 months). The median intensity of stump pain was 0.85 (range, 0-8.2) versus 1.0 (range, 0-5.4) (P = 0.68; 30 days) and 0 (range, 0-8.0) versus 0 (range, 0-5.0) (P = 0.58; 6 months).<br />Conclusion: Gabapentin administered in the first 30 postoperative days after amputation does not reduce the incidence or intensity of postamputation pain.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0003-3022
Volume :
105
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Anesthesiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
17065896
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200611000-00023