Back to Search Start Over

The Movement Assessment of Infants (MAI) as a predictor of two-year neurodevelopmental outcome for infants born at term who are at social risk.

Authors :
Rose-Jacobs R
Cabral H
Beeghly M
Brown ER
Frank DA
Source :
Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association [Pediatr Phys Ther] 2004 Winter; Vol. 16 (4), pp. 212-21.
Publication Year :
2004

Abstract

Purpose: This prospective longitudinal study was designed to evaluate whether the four-month Movement Assessment of Infants (MAI), predicted two-year cognitive and motor developmental status measured by the Mental (MDI) and Psychomotor (PDI) Scales of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID).<br />Methods: The subjects were 134 infants born at term who were considered at developmental risk due to biological and social risk factors. Different masked examiners assessed the infants at each age.<br />Results: Infants' average MAI total risk scores (MAI TRS) at four months were negatively correlated with their BSID MDI scores (r = -0.23, p = 0.007) but not PDI scores at two years. Infants classified as high risk on the MAI (TRS >13) were approximately three times more likely than infants with a lower risk MAI classification (TRS < or =13) to have a high-risk MDI (< or =84) classification. Lower MAI risk status at four months was a predictor of cognitive functioning falling within normal limits for age (MDI >84) at two years, with 76% negative and 50% positive predictive values.<br />Conclusion: The MAI appears to be valid for use with infants born at term who are at risk of developmental delay and may be a useful tool to help clinicians make decisions about intervention services.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0898-5669
Volume :
16
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
17057551
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PEP.0000145931.87152.CO