Back to Search Start Over

Metastatic neuroendocrine hepatic tumors: resection improves survival.

Authors :
Musunuru S
Chen H
Rajpal S
Stephani N
McDermott JC
Holen K
Rikkers LF
Weber SM
Source :
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) [Arch Surg] 2006 Oct; Vol. 141 (10), pp. 1000-4; discussion 1005.
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment for hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial because of the often indolent nature of these tumors. We sought to determine the effect of 3 major treatment modalities including medical therapy, hepatic artery embolization, and surgical resection, ablation, or both in patients with liver-only neuroendocrine metastases, with the hypothesis that surgical treatment is associated with improvement in survival.<br />Design: Retrospective study.<br />Setting: Tertiary care center.<br />Patients: Patients with metastatic liver-only neuroendocrine tumors were identified from hospital records.<br />Interventions: Patients were subdivided into those receiving medical therapy, hepatic artery embolization, or surgical management.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Effect of treatment on survival and palliation of symptoms was analyzed.<br />Results: From January 1996 through May 2004, 48 patients with liver-only neuroendocrine metastases were identified (median follow-up, 20 months), including 36 carcinoid and 12 islet cell tumors. Seventeen patients were treated conservatively, which consisted of octreotide (n = 7), observation (n = 6), or systemic chemotherapy (n = 4). Hepatic artery embolization was performed in 18 patients. Thirteen patients underwent surgical therapy, including anatomical liver resection (n = 6), ablation (n = 4), or combined resection and ablation (n = 3). No difference was noted in the percentage of liver involved with tumor between the 3 groups. An association of improved survival was noted in patients treated surgically, with a 3-year survival of 83% for patients treated by surgical resection, compared with 31% in patients treated with medical therapy or embolization (P = .01). No difference in palliation of symptoms was noted among the 3 treatment groups (P = .2).<br />Conclusion: In patients with liver-only neuroendocrine metastases, surgical therapy using resection, ablation, or both is associated with improved survival.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0004-0010
Volume :
141
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
17043278
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.10.1000