Back to Search
Start Over
Lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz plus two nucleoside analogues as first-line antiretroviral therapy: a non-randomized comparison.
- Source :
-
Antiviral therapy [Antivir Ther] 2006; Vol. 11 (5), pp. 609-18. - Publication Year :
- 2006
-
Abstract
- Background: Although efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ ritonavir (LPV/r) are both recommended antiretroviral agents for combination therapy in drug-naive HIV-infected patients, no randomized comparison of their efficacy and tolerability is available yet. A multi-cohort prospective observational comparative study was performed.<br />Methods: Efficacy was examined comparing time to virological failure, CD4 recovery and clinical progression. Tolerability was examined comparing time to treatment discontinuation for any reason and for toxicity and time to liver enzymes or lipid alterations. Survival analysis was conducted by an intent-to-treat principle using the Kaplan-Meier method, and standard and weighted Cox regression models.<br />Results: A total of 674 antiretroviral-naive patients starting a two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimen plus either EFV (n = 481) or LPV/r (n = 193) were examined. At baseline, patients starting LPV/r had higher HIV RNA and lower CD4+ T-cell counts. There was no difference in the adjusted hazards of virological failure (LPV/r versus EFV relative hazard [RH] 1.16, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.58-2.32, P = 0.67), CD4 recovery (RH = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.66-1.30, P = 0.66), clinical progression (RH = 1.64, 95% CI: 0.70-3.84, P = 0.25), drug discontinuation for toxicity (RH = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.51-1.64, P = 0.76) and for any reason, and rates of liver enzyme and total/low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol elevation. In contrast, the rate of triglycerides elevations (> 1 NCEP Adult Treatment Panel III category increase) was higher in the LPV/r group (RH = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.14-2.50; P = 0.01). Models weighted for the inverse of conditional probability of receiving either drug applied to the efficacy endpoints yielded similar results. CD4 recovery with both drugs was also similar in the lowest CD4 strata.<br />Conclusions: Our analysis suggests similar efficacy and tolerability for EFV- or LPV/r-based first-line antiretroviral regimens. LPV/r was associated with higher rates of hypertriglyceridaemia.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Alkynes
Benzoxazines adverse effects
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Cyclopropanes
Disease Progression
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
HIV Infections immunology
HIV Infections virology
HIV Protease Inhibitors adverse effects
Humans
Hypertriglyceridemia etiology
Italy
Lopinavir
Male
Middle Aged
Nucleosides adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Pyrimidinones adverse effects
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors adverse effects
Ritonavir adverse effects
Treatment Failure
Viral Load
Benzoxazines therapeutic use
HIV Infections drug therapy
HIV Protease Inhibitors therapeutic use
HIV-1
Nucleosides therapeutic use
Pyrimidinones therapeutic use
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors therapeutic use
Ritonavir therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1359-6535
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Antiviral therapy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 16964829