Back to Search Start Over

Aortic valve repair for congenital abnormalities of the aortic valve.

Authors :
Quader MA
Rosenthal GL
Qureshi AM
Mee RB
Mumtaz MA
Joshi R
Duncan BW
Source :
Heart, lung & circulation [Heart Lung Circ] 2006 Aug; Vol. 15 (4), pp. 248-55. Date of Electronic Publication: 2006 Jul 07.
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Background: Due to shortcomings of any valve replacement, repairing and retaining the native valve may be beneficial for congenital aortic valve disease.<br />Methods: Retrospective review of data and follow-up of aortic valve repair from a single institution.<br />Results: From 1993 to 2001, 56 patients underwent aortic valve repair [median age 13.4 years (range 1 day to 45 years)]. The predominant aortic valve lesion was mixed aortic stenosis/aortic insufficiency 25 (45%), aortic insufficiency 24 (43%) and aortic stenosis 7 (13%). Repair techniques included sub-commissural plication 36 (64%), commissurotomy 24 (43%), cusp plication 15 (27%), pericardial patch cusp extension 8 (14%) and resuspension of commissures 4 (7%). Most patients (88%) required a combination of techniques; 61% required additional procedures. Hospital survival was 55/56 [98%; (95% CI 91-100%)] no patient was discharged on anticoagulation for aortic valve pathology. Fifty-three patients [95%; (95% CI 85-98%)] remain alive after a median follow-up of 37 months; four survivors required aortic valve replacement and two required repeat aortic valve repair [84%; (95% CI 72-91%) reintervention-free survival].<br />Conclusions: (1) In this study, aortic valve repair for congenital abnormalities avoided reoperation in the majority of patients, avoided anticoagulation and retained growth potential of the valve. (2) Repeat aortic valve repair or replacement was used to treat subsequent valve deterioration.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1443-9506
Volume :
15
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Heart, lung & circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
16829195
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2006.05.005