Back to Search Start Over

Are generic formulations of carvedilol of inferior pharmaceutical quality compared with the branded formulation?

Authors :
Smith JC
Tarocco G
Merazzi F
Salzmann U
Source :
Current medical research and opinion [Curr Med Res Opin] 2006 Apr; Vol. 22 (4), pp. 709-20.
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Introduction: Carvedilol is a comprehensive beta(1)-, beta(2)-, and alpha(1)-adrenoreceptor blocker marketed as Dilatrend by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Roche) and as Coreg by GlaxoSmithKline for the treatment of hypertension, stable angina pectoris, post myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction and all degrees of symptomatic chronic heart failure.<br />Objectives: In this report, the pharmaceutical qualities of Dilatrend 6.25 mg, 12.5 mg and 25 mg tablets and 35 randomly selected carvedilol generic products from 20 manufacturers in 19 countries have been assessed according to the European Pharmacopoeia and the Roche specifications.<br />Methods: The generic products were subjected to four key tests: carvedilol content, tablet hardness, tablet dissolution and purity.<br />Results: All three Dilatrend strengths conformed to specifications. At least 17/35 (48.6%) generic products failed the specifications due to: incorrect mean carvedilol content (outside 95-105%) - three products; excess impurities (> 0.3%) - one product; incorrect tablet hardness (outside 30-70 N) - 11 products; inadequate dissolution (< 75% in 30 min) - nine products. Seven products (20%) failed two tests, generally hardness and dissolution.<br />Conclusion: The dose-for-dose substitution of the original formulation of carvedilol (Dilatrend) with a pharmaceutically different, and possibly inferior, generic copy may conceivably result in a change in the efficacy of the treatment, because of an unanticipated change in pharmacokinetics or bioequivalence, and/or in a change in tolerability due to impurities.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0300-7995
Volume :
22
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Current medical research and opinion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
16684432
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906X96461