Back to Search Start Over

[Trial of pioglitazone for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: insufficient evidence].

Authors :
Holleman F
Gerdes VE
de Vries JH
Hoekstra JB
Source :
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde [Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd] 2006 Feb 18; Vol. 150 (7), pp. 358-60.
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

The PROactive study was a multicentre, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial that was intended to show a benefit of pioglitazone in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. However, the result for the primary composite endpoint was not significant. The most important secondary endpoint (time to death, myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident) did show a significant reduction of 16%, but any potential benefit was outweighed by a major increase in the incidence ofhospitalisation for heart failure in the pioglitazone-treated group. Moreover, in this secondary prevention trial, there was marked undertreatment with statins while no effect of pioglitazone was observed in those who did receive a statin. Finally, no adjustment was made for the poorer glycaemic control in the placebo group. Based on these data, broadening the indication for pioglitazone in patients with diabetes cannot be recommended.

Details

Language :
Dutch; Flemish
ISSN :
0028-2162
Volume :
150
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
16523797