Back to Search Start Over

Combination of analyte protectants to overcome matrix effects in routine GC analysis of pesticide residues in food matrixes.

Authors :
Mastovská K
Lehotay SJ
Anastassiades M
Source :
Analytical chemistry [Anal Chem] 2005 Dec 15; Vol. 77 (24), pp. 8129-37.
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-microL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0003-2700
Volume :
77
Issue :
24
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Analytical chemistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
16351165
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0515576