Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study.

MLA

Mariappan, Paramananthan, et al. “Stone and Pelvic Urine Culture and Sensitivity Are Better than Bladder Urine as Predictors of Urosepsis Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Clinical Study.” The Journal of Urology, vol. 173, no. 5, May 2005, pp. 1610–14. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154350.78826.96.

APA

Mariappan, P., Smith, G., Bariol, S. V., Moussa, S. A., & Tolley, D. A. (2005). Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. The Journal of Urology, 173(5), 1610–1614. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154350.78826.96

Chicago

Mariappan, Paramananthan, Gordon Smith, Simon V Bariol, Sami A Moussa, and David A Tolley. 2005. “Stone and Pelvic Urine Culture and Sensitivity Are Better than Bladder Urine as Predictors of Urosepsis Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Clinical Study.” The Journal of Urology 173 (5): 1610–14. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000154350.78826.96.