Evaluating immediate and long-range effect of a geriatric clerkship using reflections and ratings from participants as students and as residents.

This article describes a longitudinal study developed to assess perceived usefulness of a mandatory geriatric clerkship from the perspective of junior students completing the newly initiated program in 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 and these same students as second- or third-year residents. End-of-clerkship student evaluations were compared with follow-up resident surveys of those same students to identify the utility of information provided and strengths and weaknesses of the initial course experience. Students participated in hospice, outpatient clinics, nursing homes, and transitional care venues during their clerkship experience at the Donald W. Reynolds Department of Geriatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Two hundred eighty-five student evaluations were collected, and 143 resident surveys were returned. Quantitative and qualitative data from students and residents corroborated each other in identifying strengths and weaknesses of the clerkship. Hospice information was successfully incorporated into residency practice. In contrast, outpatient clinic, nursing home, and transitional care segments of the clerkship were perceived as inadequate. Survey responses validated faculty changes that were initiated in the following years. These changes use settings and patients that more accurately mirror those seen in typical resident encounters.