Back to Search
Start Over
Use of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with intra-abdominal infections.
- Source :
-
Clinical therapeutics [Clin Ther] 2004 Oct; Vol. 26 (10), pp. 1564-77. - Publication Year :
- 2004
-
Abstract
- Background: Numerous combination and single-agent antimicrobial regimens are available for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Selection of empiric agents must be directed at providing reliable activity against endotoxin-generating Escherichia coli, other gram-negative facultative bacteria, and anaerobes such as Bacteroides fragilis. Safety profiles, pharmacokinetic profiles, and cost-effectiveness must also be considered. Use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections has recently been advocated.<br />Methods: We review 2 prospective, comparative clinical trials conducted between 1992 and 2002 that evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV ciprofloxacin in patients with intra-abdominal infections. Separate pharmacoeconomic analyses conducted for each study are also reviewed.<br />Results: A total of 4 ciprofloxacin studies (2 clinical, 2 pharmacoeconomic) comprise the database. The combination of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was at least as effective as imipenem/cilastatin and clinically more effective than piperacillin/tazobactam therapy, based on clinical success end points. In 1 trial, treatment success for the clinically valid population was reported for 84% (93/111) of patients treated with IV ciprofloxacin/metronidazole, 86% (91/106) of those treated with IV/oral ciprofloxacin/metronidazole, and 81% of those treated with IV imipenem/cilastatin (91/113). The IV/oral ciprofloxacin/metronidazole regimen had a statistically significant lower mean infection-related cost than the IV only ciprofloxacin/metronidazole plus imipenem groups (difference of approximately 1100 US dollars; P = 0.029). In the second clinical trial, clinical resolution rates were statistically different for patients receiving IV/oral ciprofloxacin/metronidazole (74%) versus IV piperacillin/tazobactam therapy (63%; P = 0.047). Ciprofloxacin/metronidazole was more cost-effective compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (2200 US dollars-3600 US dollars lower cost-effective ratios per patient) regardless of whether the patient had a diagnosis of appendicitis or whether a switch to an oral drug was permissible.<br />Conclusions: In the studies reviewed herein, the combination of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was an effective and safe regimen for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. This regimen has potential advantages over exclusively IV regimens, including the option of sequential IV/oral therapy, patient convenience, cost savings, and reduced hospital stay.
- Subjects :
- Abdominal Abscess microbiology
Anti-Infective Agents economics
Ciprofloxacin economics
Drug Therapy, Combination
Hospitalization
Humans
Peritonitis microbiology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Abdominal Abscess drug therapy
Anti-Infective Agents therapeutic use
Ciprofloxacin therapeutic use
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections drug therapy
Peritonitis drug therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0149-2918
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical therapeutics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 15598473
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.10.013