Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of the prognostic potential of hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase (HYAL-1), CD44v6 and microvessel density for prostate cancer.
- Source :
-
International journal of cancer [Int J Cancer] 2004 Oct 20; Vol. 112 (1), pp. 121-9. - Publication Year :
- 2004
-
Abstract
- Despite the development of nomograms designed to evaluate a prostate cancer (PCa) patient's prognosis, the information has been limited to PSA, clinical stage, Gleason score and tumor volume estimates. We compared the prognostic potential of 4 histologic markers, hyaluronic acid (HA), HYAL-1-type hyaluronidase (HAase), CD44v6 and microvessel density (MVD) using immunohistochemistry. HA is a glycosaminoglycan that promotes tumor metastasis. CD44 glycoproteins serve as cell surface receptors for HA, and the CD44v6 isoform is associated with tumor metastasis. HYAL-1-type HAase is expressed in tumor cells and, like other HAases, degrades HA into angiogenic fragments. Archival PCa specimens (n=66) were obtained from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized PCa and had a minimum follow-up of 72 months (range 72-131 months, mean 103 months). For HA, HYAL-1 and CD44v6 staining and MVD determination, a biotinylated HA-binding protein, an anti-HYAL-1 IgG, an anti-CD44v6 IgG and an anti-CD34 IgG were used, respectively. HA and HYAL-1 staining was classified as either low- or high-grade. CD44v6 staining and MVD were evaluated quantitatively and then grouped as either low- or high-grade. Using 72 months as the cut-off limit for evaluating biochemical recurrence, HA, HYAL-1, combined HA-HYAL-1, CD44v6 and MVD staining predicted progression with 96%, 84%, 84%, 68% and 76% sensitivity, respectively. Specificity was, 61% (HA), 80.5% (HYAL-1), 87.8% (HA-HYAL-1), 56.1% (CD44v6) and 61% (MVD). Sensitivity and specificity values for each marker did not change significantly in a subset of 45 patients for whom follow-up of longer than 112 months was available. In univariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, preoperative PSA, Gleason sum, margin status, seminal vesicle, extraprostatic extension (EPE), HA, HYAL-1, HA-HYAL-1 and MVD, but not CD44v6, age and clinical stage, were significant in predicting biochemical recurrence (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis using stepwise selection, only preoperative PSA (hazard ratio/unit PSA change=1.086, p < 0.0001), EPE (hazard ratio=6.22, p=0.0016) and HYAL-1 (hazard ratio=8.196, p=0.0009)/HA-HYAL-1 (hazard ratio=5.191, p=0.0021) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. HA was an independent predictor of prognosis if HYAL-1 staining inference was not included in the multivariate model. In our retrospective study with 72- to 131-month follow-up, EPE, preoperative PSA and HYAL-1 either alone or together with HA (i.e., combined HA-HYAL-1) were independent prognostic indicators for PCa.
- Subjects :
- Disease Progression
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Male
Microcirculation pathology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms blood supply
Prostatic Neoplasms surgery
Sensitivity and Specificity
Biomarkers, Tumor metabolism
Glycoproteins metabolism
Hyaluronan Receptors metabolism
Hyaluronic Acid metabolism
Hyaluronoglucosaminidase metabolism
Prostatic Neoplasms metabolism
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0020-7136
- Volume :
- 112
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 15305383
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20368