Back to Search
Start Over
Multinational economic evaluation of valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT).
- Source :
-
American heart journal [Am Heart J] 2004 Jul; Vol. 148 (1), pp. 122-8. - Publication Year :
- 2004
-
Abstract
- Background: The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) compared valsartan versus placebo in 5010 patients taking prescribed background therapy for New York Heart Association class II to IV heart failure. Valsartan reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalization and improved clinical signs and symptoms of heart failure. We sought to compare resource use, costs, and health outcomes among patients taking prescribed therapy for heart failure and randomly assigned to receive valsartan or placebo.<br />Methods: Measures of resource use were based on data collected during the trial. Unit cost estimates were collected from individual countries and converted to 1999 US dollars. Total costs were estimated for hospitalizations, inpatient and outpatient physician services, ambulance transportation, deaths outside the hospital, and outpatient cardiovascular medications.<br />Results: Mean follow-up was 23 months. Mean costs for heart failure hospitalizations were 423 dollars lower among patients receiving valsartan (95% CI, -706 to -146). Mean total costs were 9008 dollars for patients receiving valsartan and 8464 dollars for patients receiving placebo, a net incremental cost of 545 dollars (95% CI, -149 to 1148), including the cost of valsartan. There was an overall reduction in total costs of 929 dollars (95% CI, -3243 to 1533) among patients not receiving an ACE inhibitor at baseline but a slight increase in costs of 334 dollars (95% CI, -497 to 1199) among those receiving an ACE inhibitor without a beta-blocker and a 1246 dollars increase (95% CI, 54 to 2230) in patients receiving both an ACE inhibitor and a beta-blocker at baseline.<br />Conclusions: Valsartan provided clinical benefits at a mean incremental cost of 285 dollars per year during the trial. In patients not taking ACE inhibitors, valsartan was economically attractive, increasing survival while reducing or marginally increasing overall costs.
- Subjects :
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists economics
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists therapeutic use
Aged
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors economics
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors therapeutic use
Antihypertensive Agents therapeutic use
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Resources economics
Health Resources statistics & numerical data
Heart Failure mortality
Hospitalization economics
Hospitalization statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Proportional Hazards Models
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Tetrazoles therapeutic use
Valine analogs & derivatives
Valine therapeutic use
Valsartan
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Agents economics
Health Care Costs
Heart Failure drug therapy
Heart Failure economics
Tetrazoles economics
Valine economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6744
- Volume :
- 148
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- American heart journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 15215801
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.040