Species-specific responses to metals in organically enriched river water, with emphasis on effects of humic acids.

Invertebrate communities in polluted rivers are often exposed to a wide variety of compounds. Due to complex interactions, 'pollution tolerant' species are not necessarily the most tolerant species to toxicants tested under standard laboratory conditions. It was hypothesized that the distribution of species in polluted rivers is not only dependent on the tolerance of species to toxicants, but also on species-specific capacities to modify or compensate for negative effects of toxicants. To test this hypothesis, species-specific responses to metals in organically enriched river water were studied under controlled conditions. The zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha and the midge Chironomus riparius were exposed to metal-polluted water from the River Dommel. Additionally, the (interactive) effects of metals and humic acids (HA) on both species were evaluated. In spite of a lower tolerance of Chironomus riparius to metals in laboratory studies, the midge was the most tolerant of the two test species to metal-polluted site water. The results indicated that the sensitivities of the two test species determined in laboratory tests were inversely related to their sensitivities to polluted river water. In accordance with these results, midge larvae were protected from copper (Cu) toxicity by HA, while metal toxicity was not reduced (Cu) or even amplified (cadmium) by HA for the zebra mussel. Thus, the presence of (naturally occurring) HA in site water may partly account for discrepancies between responses of species to bioassays and toxicity tests. It is suggested that these differences in responses to metals in site water are strongly influenced by species-specific preferences for organic compounds (like HA). It is concluded that the response to organic compounds present in site water largely determines whether a species is classified as 'pollution tolerant' or 'pollution sensitive'.