Back to Search Start Over

The effects of cash and lottery incentives on mailed surveys to physicians: a randomized trial.

Authors :
Leung GM
Ho LM
Chan MF
M Johnston JM
Wong FK
Source :
Journal of clinical epidemiology [J Clin Epidemiol] 2002 Aug; Vol. 55 (8), pp. 801-7.
Publication Year :
2002

Abstract

Low response rates, especially among physicians, are a common problem in mailed survey research. We conducted a randomized trial to examine the effects of cash and lottery incentives on response rates. A total of 4,850 subjects were randomized to one of three interventions accompanying a mailed survey-no incentive (n = 1,700), cash payment [three levels of Hong Kong dollars (HKD) $10, $20, and $40; N = 50 in each subgroup], or entry into a lottery (three levels of HKD$1,000, $2,000, and $4,000; N = 1,000 in each subgroup) on receipt of the completed questionnaire. The response rates were higher among those offered incentives than those without (19.8% vs. 16.8%, P =.012). Cash was the more effective incentive compared to lottery (27.3% vs. 19.4%, P =.017). Response also increased substantially between the first and second mailings (14.2% vs. 18.8%, P >.001). In addition, those with specialist qualifications were more willing to participate in mailed surveys. We found no significant differences in response outcomes among the various incentive arms. Cash reward at the $20 level was the most cost-effective intervention, in terms of cost per responder. Further systematic examination of the effects of different incentive strategies in epidemiologic studies should be encouraged.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0895-4356
Volume :
55
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical epidemiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
12384195
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00442-0