Cite
Endometrial cytodiagnosis using a new softcyte versus a conventional endocyte.
MLA
Nagai, Nobutaka, et al. “Endometrial Cytodiagnosis Using a New Softcyte versus a Conventional Endocyte.” Oncology Reports, vol. 9, no. 3, May 2002, pp. 483–87. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=cmedm&AN=11956614&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Nagai, N., Uebaba, Y., Oshita, T., Sakata, K., Murakami, J., Shigemasa, K., & Ohama, K. (2002). Endometrial cytodiagnosis using a new softcyte versus a conventional endocyte. Oncology Reports, 9(3), 483–487.
Chicago
Nagai, Nobutaka, Yoshimi Uebaba, Takafumi Oshita, Kenichiro Sakata, Junko Murakami, Kazushi Shigemasa, and Koso Ohama. 2002. “Endometrial Cytodiagnosis Using a New Softcyte versus a Conventional Endocyte.” Oncology Reports 9 (3): 483–87. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=cmedm&AN=11956614&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.