All-blood (miniplegia) versus dilute cardioplegia in experimental surgical revascularization of evolving infarction.

Background: The advantages of blood cardioplegia include the oxygen-carrying capacity, superior oncotic and buffering properties, and endogenous antioxidants contained in blood. However, the partial dilution of blood in 4:1 (blood:crystalloid) cardioplegic solutions may nullify these advantages and progressively dilute blood during continuous retrograde delivery. This study tested the hypothesis that all-blood (66:1) cardioplegia provides superior myocardial protection compared with dilute (4:1) cardioplegia delivered in a continuous retrograde modality during surgical reperfusion of evolving myocardial infarction.
Methods and Results: After 60 minutes of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusion, anesthetized canines were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass and randomized to either all-blood cardioplegia (AB group) or dilute blood cardioplegia (Dil group). After cross clamping, arrest was induced with 5 minutes of tepid (30 degrees C) antegrade potassium all-blood or dilute blood cardioplegia and maintained with tepid retrograde coronary sinus cardioplegia for a total of 1 hour. The LAD was released after 30 minutes of arrest, simulating revascularization. The cardioplegia hematocrit for the Dil group was lower than that for the AB group (7+/-1% versus 12+/-2%, P<0.05); at the end of bypass, systemic hematocrit was lower in the Dil group than in the Ab group (15+/-1% versus 20+/-1%, P<0.05). Infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining) was comparable between the AB and Dil groups (29.6+/-2.9% versus 30.3+/-3.9% of area at risk), and there was no difference in area-at-risk myocardium systolic shortening (by sonomicrometry, -0.3+/-1% versus -0.4+/-1%). Tissue edema after bypass tended to be greater in the Dil group compared with the AB group in the heart (82+/-0% versus 81+/-1%), lung (79+/-1% versus 78+/-1%), liver (75+/-1% versus 74+/-0%), and skeletal muscle (76+/-1% versus 73+/-2%) and was significantly greater in the duodenum (80+/-1% versus 79+/-1%, P<0.05) and kidney (82+/-1% versus 79+/-1%, P<0.05). Postexperimental endothelial function (relaxation of acetylcholine) was impaired in LADs of the AB group versus the Dil group (59+/-6% versus 77+/-5%, P<0.05).
Conclusions: Both all-blood cardioplegia and dilute cardioplegia have disadvantages, but these do not have an impact on the pathogenesis of infarct size or recovery of regional contractile function.