Back to Search Start Over

Blockade of adenosine receptors with aminophylline limits ischemic preconditioning in human beings.

Authors :
Schaefer S
Correa SD
Valente RJ
Laslett LJ
Source :
American heart journal [Am Heart J] 2001 Sep; Vol. 142 (3), pp. E4.
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

Background: Ischemic preconditioning is characterized by the limitation of infarct size or ischemic signs after one or more brief episodes of ischemia, a process that probably involves stimulation of adenosine receptors. One human model of ischemic preconditioning is repetitive occlusion of a coronary artery during angioplasty. By using this method of inducing ischemia, we tested the hypothesis that blockade of adenosine receptors with aminophylline would abolish ischemic preconditioning in human beings.<br />Methods: Twenty-six patients undergoing angioplasty were randomly assigned to receive either aminophylline (6 mg/kg IV) or placebo before repetitive coronary occlusion (two 2-minute occlusions separated by 5 minutes). ST-segment changes on the surface electrocardiogram were used as a measure of myocardial ischemia. Serum theophylline levels and the conduction response to an intravenous bolus of adenosine were used to assess the efficacy of adenosine receptor blockade.<br />Results: Repetitive coronary occlusion resulted in a reduction in ST-segment shift in 9 of 13 patients given placebo. In contrast, 9 of 13 patients receiving aminophylline had an increase in ST-segment shift on the second occlusion (P =.002). Patients receiving aminophylline (mean serum theophylline level of 8.38 +/- 0.45 mg/dL) did not have significant conduction block with intravenous adenosine.<br />Conclusions: Repetitive coronary occlusion reduces the signs of ischemia in human beings, a process limited by blockade of adenosine receptors.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0002-8703
Volume :
142
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American heart journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
11526374
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.117133