Back to Search Start Over

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for recurrent stress urinary incontinence.

Authors :
Moore RD
Speights SE
Miklos JR
Source :
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists [J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc] 2001 Aug; Vol. 8 (3), pp. 389-92.
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

Study Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women with previous vaginal or abdominal retropubic continence surgery.<br />Design: Retrospective analysis over 36 months (Canadian Task Force classification III).<br />Setting: Community hospital.<br />Patients: Thirty-three consecutive patients.<br />Intervention: Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.<br />Measurements and Main Results: Data were obtained by retrospective chart review, telephone interviews, and follow-up physical examinations. Of the 33 patients, 17 (52%) had undergone open retropubic procedures (Burch or Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz), 11 (33%) had had vaginal retropubic needle suspension, and 5 (15%) pubovaginal sling operation. Additional laparoscopic and/or vaginal reconstructive surgery was completed in 32 women (97%) at time of laparoscopic Burch. Average overall operating time was 165 minutes (range 60-287 min), mean estimated blood loss was 178 ml (range 50-600 ml), and hospital stay was 1.1 days. Three intraoperative complications occurred, two cystotomies and one serosal bowel injury. Postoperative objective evaluation over average follow-up of 18.6 months revealed a 90% stress urinary incontinence cure rate.<br />Conclusion: Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is safe and effective treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women who have undergone previous procedures for retropubic continence.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1074-3804
Volume :
8
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
11509779
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60336-2