[Changes in otoacoustic emission during the glycerol test in the ears of patients with Meniere's disease].

Monitoring of cochlear function is one proposed clinical application of otoacoustic emission (OAE). To determine the clinical utility of OAE in monitoring, we studied changes in OAE during the glycerol test used to diagnose endolymphatic hydrops. Transiently evoked OAE (TEOAE) and distortion product OAE (DPOAE) were measured before and 3 hours after oral administration of glycerol in 22 ears of patients with Meniere's disease. The positive result in the glycerol test was observed in 11 of 22 ears. TEOAE was recorded using a nonlinear click stimulus, and total echo power (TEP) of the whole response and filtered echo power (FEP) of its mid-frequency (1000-2000 Hz) component were used as TEOAE parameters. The growth functions of DPOAE were recorded at 3 F2 frequencies--1000, 1500, and 2000 Hz. Changes in the growth function were determined based on changes in 2 parameters--maximum level and detection threshold of DPOAE. When changes in these 4 parameters exceeded 2 standard deviations above mean test-retest variability determined from OAE data for 17 normal ears, they were considered significant. Significant changes indicating improved cochlear function in 4 OAE parameters or the appearance of OAE during the glycerol test were judged positive for OAE. Regardless of glycerol test results, positive findings were observed in both OAEs whenever a pure-tone threshold at 1000 or 2000 Hz improved. However, even in ears for which pure-tone thresholds at these frequencies did not improve, both OAEs frequently exhibited positive findings. In all ears with a positive result in the glycerol test, positive findings were observed in DPOAE, but not in TEOAE. Of the 2 parameters of TEOAE, FEP always exhibited a positive finding in ears with a positive TEP finding and FEP positivity was higher than that of TEP. In DPOAE, no cases showed a positive finding only at F2 = 2000 Hz, and DPOAE at F2 = 1000 Hz could not be detected in 4 ears due to high noise floor. Overall, positive findings were obtained in 14 ears (63.9%) for TEOAE and 20 ears (90.9%) for DPOAE. In only 1 ear were no positive findings observed in either OAE. The sensitivity of OAE measurement as a diagnostic test for endolymphatic hydrops was higher than that of pure-tone audiometry. Of the 2 OAEs, test sensitivity was much higher for DPOAE than for TEOAE. These results show that OAE measurement detects changes in cochlear function during the glycerol test more sensitively than pure-tone audiometry. They also suggest that FEP is a better indicator than TEP as a parameter of TEOAE, and that DPOAE measurement at F2 = 1000 and 1500 Hz is sufficient for practical clinical use. However, of the 2 OAEs, DPOAE was considered more appropriate than TEOAE for monitoring during the glycerol test because of its high sensitivity in detection of changes in cochlear function. In conclusion, clinical use of OAE, especially DPOAE, as a test complementary to pure-tone audiometry during the glycerol test is very useful and will improve the diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops.