Back to Search Start Over

[Risk factors for dislocation of a cementless total hip endoprosthesis--a statistical analysis].

Authors :
Giurea A
Zehetgruber H
Funovics P
Grampp S
Karamat L
Gottsauner-Wolf F
Source :
Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete [Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb] 2001 May-Jun; Vol. 139 (3), pp. 194-9.
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

Aim: This retrospective study aimed at the statistical identification of risk factors for dislocation for a certain cementless hip endoprothesis.<br />Material and Method: At our department 2605 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed between 1987 and 1997. In 40 patients (1.5%) a dislocation occurred. These patients were compared with a control group matched in number.<br />Results: No difference was found in both groups with respect to age, height, weight, body-mass index, and diagnosis. A tendency was found that more males were involved in the dislocation group. There were more previous operations found in this group (p = 0.005). Also significant was the fact, that patients in the dislocation group more often had epidural anaesthesia (p = 0.02), more often the implantation of the smaller 28-mm head (vs. 32 mm) (p = 0.02), and a higher inclination angle of the acetabular component (p = 0.02). No difference was found in terms of the surgeons experience, the postoperative leg length, femoral offset, medialisation, cranialisation and antetorsion of the acetabular component.<br />Conclusion: Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty is a multifactorial complication. With the use of the Alloclassic/Zweymüller total hip endoprothesis, a higher risk for dislocation was found for patients with previous hip surgery, the use of the smaller endoprosthesis head, a high acetabular inclination angle, and in the use of epidural anaesthesia.

Details

Language :
German
ISSN :
0044-3220
Volume :
139
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
11486620
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-16320