Back to Search
Start Over
Expert witness billing practices revisited: a pilot study of further data.
- Source :
-
The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law [J Am Acad Psychiatry Law] 2001; Vol. 29 (2), pp. 202-6. - Publication Year :
- 2001
-
Abstract
- This pilot study follows up an earlier study of the strategies and rationales by which psychiatric expert witnesses bill for their time on a case. Questionnaires were answered by participants at a workshop at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law (AAPL). In this follow-up, additional novel billing issues were addressed, some subtler than in the original study. In addition, responses to one question supported the previous finding that experts billed more reasonably when a case was simple. Additional issues included use of fee agreements and returning an unpaid-for case. The implications of these findings are discussed.
- Subjects :
- Contract Services economics
Decision Making
Ethics, Medical
Expert Testimony standards
Forensic Psychiatry statistics & numerical data
Humans
Library Services economics
Pilot Projects
Practice Management statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Attitude of Health Personnel
Expert Testimony economics
Fees and Charges statistics & numerical data
Forensic Psychiatry economics
Practice Management economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1093-6793
- Volume :
- 29
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 11471787